What is AI governance?
AI governance is the set of roles, policies, processes and records an organisation uses to decide which AI systems it builds or uses, to manage their risks to the business and to people, and to show regulators, customers and auditors that it does so. ISO 42001 is the standard for running it as a management system.
The parts of an AI governance programme
Most programmes are built from the same parts, whichever standard they follow.
- Accountability. Who approves new AI uses, who owns each system, and how top management oversees it.
- Policy. An AI policy that says what is allowed, what needs approval and what is not done.
- Inventory. Every AI system in use, with its purpose, data, owner and risk class.
- Assessment. Risk assessments for the organisation and impact assessments for the people affected.
- Controls. Data quality, human oversight, transparency to users, security and monitoring after release.
- Records. Evidence that the above happened, kept for audit and for regulators.
Standards and laws
ISO 42001, published in December 2023, specifies an AI management system and can be certified by an accredited body. Its structure matches ISO 27001, so an organisation with an ISMS can reuse much of the management-system work.
The EU AI Act sorts AI systems into prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk and minimal-risk uses, and puts most of its duties on providers and deployers of high-risk systems. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework gives a voluntary structure in four functions, Govern, Map, Measure and Manage, and is often used to organise a programme before choosing a certification.
AI governance and the rest of GRC
AI governance works best inside the existing GRC programme rather than beside it. AI risks belong on the same risk register as security and privacy risks, a DPIA often covers the same processing as an AI impact assessment, and customers ask about AI in the same security questionnaires.
That is how Certifyi is arranged. The AI governance module, built around ISO 42001 with an AI system register, an EU AI Act risk class for each system and AI impact assessments, sits in the same workspace as your other frameworks rather than in a tool of its own.
Questions
AI governance, answered
Who is responsible for AI governance?
Top management is accountable. Day to day, it usually sits with a cross-functional group from security, privacy, legal and the teams that build or buy AI, with a named owner for each system.
Do we need AI governance if we only use third-party AI tools?
Yes. Using a third-party model or AI service is still a use you are responsible for. The EU AI Act puts duties on deployers, and customers will ask what AI touches their data.
Is ISO 42001 certification required?
No law requires it. Customers and procurement teams increasingly ask for it, and it is the most widely recognised way to show an AI governance programme is in place.
Working through this for an audit?
Talk it through with someone who has run the audit before, or look up another term.
- Each customer workspace has its own database
- Every change written to a tamper-evident activity log
- Auditors get scoped, read-only access
- AI suggestions wait for a person to accept them